Bug 1415843 - Remove an unneeded call to AdjustAppendParentForAfterContent

Tag #1375

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 46 deletions

diff --git a/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp b/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp
index 053351ee14..37d1a2cff5 100644
--- a/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp
+++ b/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp
@@ -7875,8 +7875,6 @@ nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentRangeInserted(nsIContent*            aContainer,
     return;
   }
 
-  nsIContent* container = insertion.mParentFrame->GetContent();
-
   nsIAtom* frameType = insertion.mParentFrame->GetType();
   LAYOUT_PHASE_TEMP_EXIT();
   if (MaybeRecreateForFrameset(insertion.mParentFrame, aStartChild, aEndChild)) {
@@ -8014,7 +8012,6 @@ nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentRangeInserted(nsIContent*            aContainer,
         return;
       }
 
-      container = insertion.mParentFrame->GetContent();
       frameType = insertion.mParentFrame->GetType();
     }
   }
@@ -8087,49 +8084,6 @@ nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentRangeInserted(nsIContent*            aContainer,
     }
   }
 
-  // If the parent of our current prevSibling is different from the frame we'll
-  // actually use as the parent, then the calculated insertion point is now
-  // invalid and as it is unknown where to insert correctly we append instead
-  // (bug 341858).
-  // This can affect our prevSibling and isAppend, but should not have any
-  // effect on the WipeContainingBlock above, since this should only happen
-  // when neither parent is a ib-split frame and should not affect whitespace
-  // handling inside table-related frames (and in fact, can only happen when
-  // one of the parents is a table wrapper and one is an inner table or when the
-  // parent is a fieldset or fieldset content frame).  So it won't affect the
-  // {ib} or XUL box cases in WipeContainingBlock(), and the table pseudo
-  // handling will only be affected by us maybe thinking we're not inserting
-  // at the beginning, whereas we really are.  That would have made us reframe
-  // unnecessarily, but that's ok.
-  // XXXbz we should push our frame construction item code up higher, so we
-  // know what our items are by the time we start figuring out previous
-  // siblings
-  if (prevSibling && frameItems.NotEmpty() &&
-      frameItems.FirstChild()->GetParent() != prevSibling->GetParent()) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
-    nsIFrame* frame1 = frameItems.FirstChild()->GetParent();
-    nsIFrame* frame2 = prevSibling->GetParent();
-    NS_ASSERTION(!IsFramePartOfIBSplit(frame1) &&
-                 !IsFramePartOfIBSplit(frame2),
-                 "Neither should be ib-split");
-    NS_ASSERTION((frame1->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::tableFrame &&
-                  frame2->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::tableWrapperFrame) ||
-                 (frame1->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::tableWrapperFrame &&
-                  frame2->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::tableFrame) ||
-                 frame1->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::fieldSetFrame ||
-                 (frame1->GetParent() &&
-                  frame1->GetParent()->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::fieldSetFrame),
-                 "Unexpected frame types");
-#endif
-    isAppend = true;
-    nsIFrame* appendAfterFrame;
-    insertion.mParentFrame =
-      ::AdjustAppendParentForAfterContent(this, container,
-                                          frameItems.FirstChild()->GetParent(),
-                                          aStartChild, &appendAfterFrame);
-    prevSibling = ::FindAppendPrevSibling(insertion.mParentFrame, appendAfterFrame);
-  }
-
   if (haveFirstLineStyle && insertion.mParentFrame == containingBlock && isAppend) {
     // It's possible that the new frame goes into a first-line
     // frame. Look at it and see...